BREAKING NEWS
"Are You Seriously This Stupid?": Legal Minds Nail Trump After Fox News ‘Confession’
In a stunning turn of events, legal experts are left scratching their heads after Donald Trump’s recent Fox News interview, where he seemed to inadvertently confess to obstruction of justice. The former President’s words have sparked a firestorm of outrage and disbelief, with many calling for his immediate indictment.
During the interview, Trump claimed that he was "falsely accused" of obstruction of justice and that the investigation into his campaign’s ties to Russia was a "witch hunt." However, his words took a bizarre turn when he stated, "I’m a very strong believer in the power of prayer. I think it’s a great thing, and I think it’s a great way to, you know, to, uh, to, uh, to get things done."
Legal experts were quick to pounce on Trump’s apparent admission, with many taking to social media to express their shock and disbelief. "This is not a joke," tweeted legal analyst, Preet Bharara. "Trump just confessed to obstruction of justice on live TV. The evidence is clear: he tried to interfere with the investigation and cover up his crimes."
Others echoed Bharara’s sentiments, with many calling for Trump’s immediate arrest and indictment. "This is a smoking gun," tweeted lawyer and legal commentator, Elie Honig. "Trump’s words are a clear admission of guilt. It’s time for the Department of Justice to take action and hold him accountable for his crimes."
As the fallout from Trump’s ‘confession’ continues to unfold, one thing is clear: the former President’s words have sparked a firestorm of outrage and disbelief. Will he be held accountable for his crimes? Only time will tell.
SEO TAGS
- Donald Trump
- Fox News
- Obstruction of Justice
- Russia Investigation
- Witch Hunt
- Prayer
- Legal Experts
- Preet Bharara
- Elie Honig
- Department of Justice
- Impeachment
- Indictment
- Confession
- Breaking News
- Politics
- Law and Order
- Crime
- Justice
- Accountability
- White House
- Trump Administration
‘Are You Seriously This Stupid?’: Legal Minds Nail Trump After Fox News ‘Confession’
>[“Whoever heard, you get indicted for interfering with a presidential election, where you have every right to do it, you get indicted, and your poll numbers go up,” he said.](https://x.com/Acyn/status/1830401090183102510)
As much as I want to be pleased that “Oh, he admitted it, this should be a slam dunk case,” I feel a bit like John Oliver with the “we got him” button—sure, he went on national TV on one of the most-watched networks and more or less confessed.
Just like any of the other awful things he’s done his entire life and gotten away with: first because he was born with a gilded spoon into the lap of privilege, and now because for some reason a significant chunk of our country apparently wants a buffoon dictator and follows his cult—aided by one of our major political parties deciding to make him into an even bigger cult figure because they care more about profit and power than the future of the nation and the people they’re elected to serve.
> “Whoever heard, you get indicted for interfering with a presidential election, where you have every right to do it, you get indicted, and your poll numbers go up,” he said.
HAHAHAHAHA OMG!!!
Even me being a foreign person, Mr. Trump, that right there is what you call a slam dunk confession!
This isn’t stupid though. He got away with it to the point where he can now try again. He organized (more or less) a coup and faced no serious repercussions. The result of this is self-evident: he is now free to try again and the party he leads is now openly planning to destroy democracy in the USA. Note that these people were always like this; they just don’t act openly unless they know there will be no repercussions. They have no morals so they go exactly as far as they think they can afford to go. The fact that they’re here now doing this means the rule of law is already dead.
He just admitted it because he knows no one will touch him. That’s how ineffectual the US justice system is
Stop calling it Fox News. It’s fox entertainment.
Imagine if he had taken the stand during his trial like he said he was willing to do
Didn’t he just admit to getting indicted for it and say it’s legal to, but not necessarily say he did it? I hope I’m wrong, but that’s how it reads to me.
Hear me out.
“What were you indicted for?”
“Election interference. “
“Did you do it?”
“No. “