BREAKING NEWS
Federal Judge Rejects Donald Trump’s Request to Intervene in Wake of Hush Money Conviction
A federal judge has denied Donald Trump’s request to intervene in the case against his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, who was convicted of making hush money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels.
In a ruling issued on [Date], Judge [Judge’s Name] rejected Trump’s motion to intervene, citing a lack of standing and insufficient evidence to support the former president’s claims.
Trump’s lawyers had argued that the former president had a vested interest in the case, as Cohen’s conviction could potentially implicate Trump in the hush money payments. However, the judge found that Trump’s claims were "speculative" and lacked any concrete evidence to support them.
The ruling is a significant blow to Trump’s efforts to distance himself from the scandal, which has dogged him throughout his presidency. The case has raised questions about Trump’s involvement in the payments, which were made to Daniels in the run-up to the 2016 election.
Cohen, who was Trump’s personal lawyer and fixer, was convicted of making the payments and lying to Congress about them. He is currently serving a three-year prison sentence.
The case has sparked intense scrutiny of Trump’s business dealings and personal life, and has raised questions about his honesty and integrity.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- Federal judge rejects Donald Trump’s request to intervene in Michael Cohen’s hush money conviction
- Judge cites lack of standing and insufficient evidence to support Trump’s claims
- Trump’s lawyers argued that the former president had a vested interest in the case
- The ruling is a significant blow to Trump’s efforts to distance himself from the scandal
- The case has raised questions about Trump’s involvement in the hush money payments
SEO TAGS
- Donald Trump
- Michael Cohen
- Stormy Daniels
- Hush money
- Conviction
- Federal judge
- Intervention
- Scandal
- Politics
- Law
- Corruption
- Ethics
- Integrity
- Honesty
- Business dealings
- Personal life
- 2016 election
- Presidential election
- Political scandal
- Legal news
- Breaking news
- Current events
- Political news
- Trump administration
- Cohen conviction
- Trump’s legal troubles
- Trump’s scandals
- Trump’s controversies
RELATED ARTICLES
- Michael Cohen’s Conviction: What It Means for Trump and the 2016 Election
- Trump’s Hush Money Payments: A Timeline of the Scandal
- The Stormy Daniels Scandal: A Guide to the Key Players and Events
- Trump’s Legal Troubles: A List of His Ongoing Legal Battles
STAY TUNED FOR UPDATES
This is a developing story, and we will provide updates as more information becomes available.
Federal judge rejects Donald Trump’s request to intervene in wake of hush money conviction
View info-news.info by AudibleNod
Massive W for the American public
Death by a thousand cuts. Send this guy to jail already.
Should be a stipulation that every time Trump files another motion to dismiss based on the same arguments. His conviction date gets pushed another day early.
>In a four-page ruling, Hellerstein wrote that nothing about the high court’s July 1 ruling affected his previous conclusion that hush money payments at issue in Trump’s case “were private, unofficial acts, outside the bounds of executive authority.”
He’s taking that ‘get out of jail free’ card he got and thinks he can use it with any other board game.
Cannon will do it. He just needs an excuse to put it in her jurisdiction.
I love watching desperate donnie flailing around like a caged rat.
>They also argued a Sept. 18 sentencing, about seven weeks before Election Day, would be election interference.
Oh **now** they care about election interference.
Good, fuck Donald Trump and everything he represents and the deeper cancer that he is just a symptom of.
Every one of his defeats brings me joy.
“Falsifying Records to Conceal Another Crime Case” not Hush money case.
Republicans are never again allowed to bellyache about crime in America. By making a convicted criminal their champion they have forfeited that prerogative.
>Trump’s lawyers first asked the federal court to intervene last week, but their paperwork was kicked back because they hadn’t gotten the required clearance from Hellerstein to file it. Hours after they submitted papers Tuesday requesting Hellerstein’s permission to proceed, he issued his ruling denying it.
Another lawyer that won’t be getting paid.
I admire the even temperament of the judge who chose not to render the decision as “Get the fuck out of here with that bullshit!” So many judges are so clearly more level-headed than I would be.
“Supreme Court, if your listening …”
He’s reduced to begging – good. At some point he’ll be fined or jailed for being an antagonistic AH for filing too many garbage suits, right?